Book of revelation dating
Such information gained from the contents of the book is often called "internal evidence", and such internal evidence has a higher priority and carry more weight than the so called "external evidence", that is, information about the matter in other sources and other works.
The scholars are not really united on this matter, and in the course of certain theological views the late date is preferred today by the majority.
They never suspect that the same teachers who interpret the book wrong, date it wrong also.
After all, isn't this what the marginal notes in their Bibles report?
The interpretations based on the acceptance of the late date as correct usually place the events recorded in the book of Revelation in the still future and thus they consider the prophecies in Revelation as unfulfilled.
Rather important for the acceptance of the late date (approx.
Now, the most important points for determining the time of writing of the Book of Revelation are the statements and the information in the book, which provide time elements and hints that either directly tell time factors or else imply or indicate time elements.
Its title is derived from the first word of the text, written in Koine Greek: apokalypsis, meaning "unveiling" or "revelation" (before title pages and titles, books were commonly known by their first words, as is also the case of the Hebrew Five Books of Moses (Torah)). As we shall see, the better view is that the book was written sometime between 56-70 A. and is primarily concerned with the church's victory over the persecutions of Nero and the Jews, and the destruction of Jerusalem by Rome. Mark 16:9-20 are missing in only two, and these two manuscripts are probably the worst in our possession (the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus). 9 & 10 Exposition of Revelation 22 Identifying Gog & Magog Open Letter to Mac Deaver Paradise by Kurt Simmons Most commentators assign the book of Revelation the date of 96 A. However, the evidence for this date is so equivocal and ambiguous, its probative value is practically nothing and, in fact, is assigned more by tradition than by solid evidence. is, one would think that there must be considerable evidence to support this position. It is like the doubt the New International Version throws upon Mark 16:9-20 by separating the text from the rest of the gospel with the note: "The most reliable early manuscripts omit Mark 16:9-20." We possess about 6,000 manuscripts.Most scholars regard there being only two possible dates. Leon Morris explores this adequately in his Tyndale Commentary series volume on Revelation, and I recommend that this widely available commentary be read. I believe this parallels Matthew 25 where we find several long-time references (the Bridegroom was "delayed", vs. At the end of Revelation 20 a fire appears from heaven which delivers the godly.In the case of most books of the Bible, determining the date of its authorship, while certainly important, is not necessarily crucial to its interpretation. I believe this is the physical return of Christ, which is also described in 2Thessalonians 1:7-8 as being "fire from heaven".